Week 10
I'm still hung up on a question that has been somewhat of a specter in our conversations, which is, is the formation of racial identity for people of color always in relation to whiteness? This has come up when we've talked about migration and crossing borders, both within the U.S. and internationally, and when people are granted conditional access to whiteness to further white supremacist projects of hierarchical domination (readings from Sanchez, readings on Asian Americans, discussions on mixed black folks crossing borders and becoming legally white by different states' definitions), or when people are framed in terms of their relation to whiteness, whether that relation is oppositional or proximal. I think my original question/wording could be a little fatalistic, so I'll add another one: how has and can identity formation subvert the dominating effect of whiteness, maybe even or necessarily by working in a different framework altogether? What are these different frameworks that are possible? Does "people of color" always imply an inherent definition in relation to whiteness? How does the term "people of color" operate, become salient or irrelevant, take on different meaning when put in a global context?
Comments
Post a Comment